Stoner SEC
SEC advice on which NFTs are securities
94 / The US government and regulatory agencies are tackling digital assets, with the IRS clearly defining NFTs, and the SEC taking aim at projects like Stoner Cats for potentially misleading investors.
Your browser does not support the audio element.
Timeline
12:37
Stick Drippy Crystals
Episode notes
Edit these notes…
Blog post: review 9 dapp login systems https://twitter.com/fulldecent/status/1702160272180277548
Web2: passwords (should be hashed)
1:1 relationship – no one else knows you logged in
Dapps: backed by public cryptography
Everyone can know – publicly published and signed
(most dapps are not really distributed)
Issues
What was actually signed?
Do you know what you’re signing?
Proper logins: attestation, entropy, time limitation, signed by customer’s private key
Found several vulnerabilities across big NFT sites
Ulti question: Many blockchain games adding web2 logins, does that affect this?
Nope – still vulnerable
Sec Stoner Cats https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2023-178
Great educational case
SEC claims:
Marketed knowledge of crypto projects
Touted price would go up
Took other steps to make investors believe they would profit
“Lighting up the cave”
How did they choose this project?
Complaints likely received
Size of the project
Probably considered people who they can actually “get” in the US
Why did they wait so long?
IRS definition of NFT https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-23-27.pdf
US Congretional Research Office https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R47189
SEC commissioners going against https://www.sec.gov/news/statement/peirce-uyeda-statement-nft-082823#_ftn1